Andrew Buncombe from Independent

The Obama administration has rejected the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline, saying the project would not benefit job creation or energy security but would undermine his goal of “leaving our children a safer, cleaner planet”.

“The State Department has decided the Keystone XL pipeline would not serve the national interests of the United States. I agree with that decision,” Mr Obama said on Friday morning at the White House.

Keystone XL would have linked existing pipeline networks in Canada and the United States to bring synthetic crude oil and diluted bitumen from Alberta’s oil sands to refineries in Illinois and, eventually, the Gulf of Mexico coast.

“Shipping dirtier crude oil into our country would not increase America’s energy security,” he said.

Killing the pipeline allows Mr Obama to claim aggressive action on the environment, potentially strengthening his hand as world leaders prepare to finalise major global climate pact within weeks that Obama hopes will be a crowning jewel for his legacy.

Immediately, some of the his Republican critics spoke out against the decision.Yet it also puts the president in a direct confrontation with Republicans and energy advocates that will almost surely spill over into the 2016 presidential election.

“The Obama admin’s politically motivated rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline is a self-inflicted attack on the U.S. economy and jobs,” former Florida Governor Jeb Bush said on Twitter.

US Senator Marco Rubio, another presidential candidate, vowed to approve the pipeline if he wins the White House in 2016.

  • Show Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

You May Also Like

The Chinese green long march

The fight against climate change is one of the most important challenges for the ...

Brazil agency to say Rio Olympics will bring no environmental gains: sources

From Reuters, Lisandra Paraguassu and Leonardo Goy Brazil’s top government finance and spending regulator ...

Is It o.k. to Tinker With the Environment to Fight Climate Change?

From The New York Times Magazine For the past few years, the Harvard professor ...